Somerset County Planning Division

"CREATING QUALITY COMMUNITIES TOGETHER"

Phone:  (908) 231-7021
Fax: (908) 707-1749
e-mail:  PlanningBd@co.somerset.nj.us
  
Staff Roster

Robert P. Bzik, AICP/PP
Director of Planning
Anthony V. McCracken, Sr., AICP/PP
 
Assistant Director

20 Grove Street
P.O. Box 3000
Somerville, NJ 08876

 

FORM- BASED ZONING

Alternatives to Conventional Zoning



Over the last several years, an alternative to conventional zoning has emerged called “Form-Based Zoning” (FBZ), which seeks to regulate the form of new development. As the names suggests, Form-Based Zoning utilizes a regulatory approach, usually through clear and simple graphics and design illustrations, to define the massing, height and location of buildings and amenities as well as their relationship to streets, public right-of-ways and civic spaces. By contrast, conventional zoning seeks to control land uses and density, but is largely silent on the matters of building and architectural form beyond basic height, floor-area and setback requirements.

The underlining concept in Form-Based Zoning is that the physical form of development is its most important and enduring feature. Form-Based Zoning trys to capture and codify that “form” in a straightforward and easy to understand visual way so planners, citizens, developers can implement the vision and turn it into a built reality or maintain the character of existing neighborhoods. Another way to think about the concept is to envision a warehouse and industrial district, which has evolved into a trendy arts district with galleries and restaurants. The form of the buildings has remained constant over time while the internal uses have changed. Form-Based Zoning would regulate the massing, height, location of buildings and the configuration of the street and sidewalks – the form and character of the former warehouse district- to maintain its larger, unified appearance with the interior uses as secondary considerations.

Differences Between Form-Based and Traditional Zoning

The principal differences between Form-Based and Traditional Zoning noted by the American Planning Association include:

  • Prescriptive, Contextual Standards. Traditional zoning prescribes minimum setbacks which permits building placement anywhere within the building envelop. Instead, Form-Based Zoning prescribes build to lines, specifically defining building placement, that control the placement of structures in relation to fronting streets and adjacent building lots resulting in a more predictable development pattern.
  • Encouraging Mixed Use. Traditional zoning makes mixed-use development difficult because it tends to focus on the segregation of land uses. Form-based zoning de-emphasizes land use regulation. Permitted uses are stated in general terms (i.e. retail, residential, professional) and identified for each building type and floor level, resulting in promoting a healthy mix of retail and residential uses.
  • Market Oriented. Traditional zoning except for special district overlay zones mainly relies on regulating land uses and separating uses like office and light industrial from residential. It tends to be very proscriptive in terms of what a community does not want in a district while Form-based zoning is heavily prescriptive and weans developers toward what the community wants and encourages integration of land uses in neighborhoods, corridors and transit oriented development. This allows the real estate market to more quickly respond to changes such as demographic trends and market shifts



Developing a Form-Based Zoning Code

One of the unique aspects about Form-Based Zoning is that it is grounded in a community visioning process involving numerous public design workshops or charettes. Through these meetings, a long range plan emerges that focuses on economic development, land use and zoning, urban design, transportation, public infrastructure improvements, as well as open space and recreation needs. This consensus vision is conveyed through visuals, perspective drawings and an illustrative plan. Planners and design professionals translate the illustrate plan into a diagrammatic regulatory plan showing what goes where and assigns building and frontage types to each available parcel of land. The physical characteristics of each building type are summarized in building standards section dealing with building height (both maximum and minimum); siting standards showing placement of structures in relation to frontage streets, adjacent building lots and public outdoor spaces; street and landscape standards; and defining a range of uses by building type.

Why Residents and Develops like Form-Based Codes

One of the first applications of Form-Based Zoning was in Seaside, Florida by architect-planner Andres Duany and The Kentlands in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Form-Based Codes
have since gained in popularity in Florida, California and Arizona for a number of reasons including:

  • Encourages public participation
  • Offers graphics, not just legal words
  • Easily understood by local officials and the public
  • Can allow developers to build “by-right”
  • Achieves more predictability
  • More enforceable than design guidelines
  • Can be applied to multiple property owners, not simply large land assemblies
  • Promotes compact mixed use, walkable projects



Examples of Form-Based Codes

Arlington, Virginia, Columbia Pike Revitalization Plan, www.co.arlington.va.us 
Austin, Texas, Traditional Neighborhood District Ordinance, www.ci.austin.tx.us 
Columbus,Ohio,TND Article, www.columbusinfobase.org
Gainsville,Florida,Land Development Code, www.comdev.cityofgainsville.org

Source: American Planning Association, PAS QUICK NOTES, Form-Based Zoning
Peter Katz, Form First, The New Urbanists Alternative to Conventional Zoning,
Planning Magazine, November 2004
Local Government Commission, Sacramento, California, www.lgc.org